On Building Things That Last
There's something seductive about speed. Ship fast, break things, iterate. The startup world has turned velocity into a virtue, and it's not entirely wrong — momentum matters. But somewhere along the way, we confused moving fast with building well.
The things I admire most were not built quickly. The buildings I love in Zurich have stood for centuries. The books I return to were agonized over for years. Even the software I respect most — the tools I use every day — was crafted by people who cared more about getting it right than getting it out.
I think about this a lot in my own work. When we started building Brazilian luxury products for a global market, the temptation was to launch everything at once. Get the brand out there, capture attention, ride the wave. But luxury doesn't work that way. Luxury is the opposite of haste. It's the promise that someone took the time to make something properly.
The Compound Effect of Quality
There's a compounding effect to durability that people underestimate. When something is built to last, it doesn't just survive — it accumulates value. A well-made product earns trust. Trust earns referrals. Referrals earn a reputation that no amount of advertising can buy.
The same is true for code, for relationships, for ideas. A system architected with care becomes easier to extend over time, not harder. A relationship built on honesty deepens rather than frays. An idea expressed clearly becomes a foundation for new ideas.
Speed gives you the opposite. A quick hack becomes technical debt. A rushed partnership becomes a liability. A hot take becomes an embarrassment.
Patience as Strategy
I've started thinking of patience not as a personality trait but as a strategic advantage. Most people can't wait. Most companies can't wait. They need this quarter's numbers, this sprint's velocity, this week's engagement metrics. That impatience creates a massive opportunity for anyone willing to play a longer game.
When you're patient, you can afford to say no to things that are merely good. You can wait for the right partner, the right market, the right moment. You can invest in foundations that won't pay off for years but will pay off enormously when they do.
This isn't about being slow. It's about being deliberate. There's a difference between someone who moves slowly because they're lazy and someone who moves deliberately because they're building something that matters.
I think the test is simple: will this thing I'm building still be relevant in ten years? If the answer is no, maybe it's not worth building at all. If the answer is yes, then it's worth taking the time to build it right.
← Back to all writings